显示标签为“adventure travel”的博文。显示所有博文

You Can’t Do Everything on the Cheap

You Can’t Do Everything on the Cheap

A bit over a year ago I wrote this post on building splurge money into your shoestring travel budget . Sometimes you have to throw that $40 a day budget out the window. While I’m a big advocate for going to cheap destinations where you can get a lot more for your money, even in those places you have to drop some serious dough sometimes if you want to get the full experience.

I got an e-mail last week from someone who was flabbergasted at how expensive lodging was in Cusco and the Sacred Valley. But he was going in July, the peak of the peak season, and going to the most popular spots in Peru. I gave him some advice on shaving costs here and there by staying in some towns that wouldn’t be so mobbed, but there’s only so much you can do. It’s the same story in Ko Pha Ngan, Agra, Bali, or Pokhara if you come at the very peak. That may be a good time to be there weather-wise or event-wise, but understand that the laws of economics still apply.

There are other cases though where you are paying a lot because the place or experience just plain costs a lot. Because of a writing assignment, I just took my second trip to the Galapagos Islands of Ecuador. If you search around on the web, you can find articles on how to “do the Galapagos on the cheap,” but really it’s all relative. You have to spend a few hundred dollars to fly out there in the first place, you’ll pay $110 in fees after arrival into a conservation fund, and then virtually everything on Santa Cruz Island is going to be twice the price as the mainland while you’re lining up a tour.

You Can’t Do Everything on the Cheap

Once you do get some kind of bargained-down tour, it’s still going to cost you north of $150 a day per person most likely to just take short jaunts to see the nearby islands. That’s cheaper than going with a well-known tour company where people are happy to pay $500 to $800 per night, but it’s not exactly shoestring travel territory. That’s because of a lot of good regulations that are in place to keep the environment from getting degraded. Guides must be trained and licensed, plus only around 100 ships are authorized to ply these waters with passengers.

Captains also have to be licensed and must undergo training on, among other things, how and where they can dock and send passengers to shore. They don’t really have a say in their itinerary. For good reasons, you can’t just hire a fishing boat captain in the harbor and say, “Show me some boobies!”

That guide you’ll get at the low end will be the kind of guy who can’t get hired by any of the real tour operators paying a good salary to real naturalists. After he struck out with all of them or got fired because of a string of guest complaints, he has ended up with you. It’s a pretty safe bet he won’t be able to lead you to the hard-to-spot creatures like this owl who hunts in the daytime. He probably won’t be able to explain why this bird is so strange and how it got that way.

I’m using this fragile Galapagos ecosystem as an example, but all around the world there are spots like this where governments have in purposely put hurdles in your way for a good cause. If you want to go to Bhutan, be prepared to pay $300+ per day. There’s no budget tour to Antarctica. Visiting Petra is really going to cost you , so suck it up and overpay. If you want to go deep into the jungle almost anywhere, be it the Amazon, Borneo , or Sumatra , you’re probably going to have to pony up some cash to do it right.

If nothing else, this is all a good reminder than you don’t have to cram everything in on your first trip around the world. You can do that river cruise down the Danube or the Amazon later when grandma is paying for it. You can do that tour up the coast of Brazil when you’ve got a good job later and are making the big bucks. You can go scuba diving on the barrier reef of Australia when you go there as a vacationer rather than a backpacker.

Traveling on a budget means understanding that you can’t do it all, whenever you want, wherever you want. You’ve still got a thousand things to pick from. Save the most expensive ones for later instead of trying to do them half-assed on a limited budget. Even with climate change and economic growth going full-tilt, those experiences should still be waiting for you…

Adventure Towns With Low Living Costs in the USA

Adventure Towns With Low Living Costs in the USA

Want to find a cheap place to live that’s also an outdoor playground?

The current issue of Outside magazine has its Facebook-fueled rundown of the best towns and cities in the USA to live in. In a big upset, the #1 place on the list was Chattanooga, Tennessee. It beat out the places that always seem to top these lists, which are almost always out west.

Outside readers are an adventurous bunch of course, so the highlighted cities all have plenty of green space and places to biking, hiking, and rock climbing. In some places that fit the bill, that’s going to cost you a bundle. Boulder may be nice, but you’ll pay San Francisco kind of prices to live there (median home price $478K after the housing crash). Chattanooga is a different story. It’s got all the adventure, including some fantastic white water rafting and a place where you can learn to go hang gliding , but it’s undiscovered enough to be cheap. The median home value is $128,000. At today’s mortgage rates, that means you can have a whole house for under a grand a month, including taxes and insurance. Rentals are likewise reasonable. Downtown is pedestrian-friendly and there’s an ec0-friendly electric bus system. One bridge across the Tennessee River is just for pedestrians and bikes. With 168,000 people, it’s a city, but is not overwhelming. (Both the photos here are from Chattanooga: riverside and Ruby Falls.)

Some of the others on the list aren’t really a bargain: Portland, Charleston, Santa Fe, and Ashland, Oregon, for instance. Some are still quite cheap though—and fun. Missoula, Montana has a population of 66,800 but has “three dozen cycling, paddling, skiing, and fly fishing shops inside city limits.” Wilmington, NC has a nice downtown, a great beach, and something many other cities are lacking: jobs.

I really liked Madison, Wisconsin when I was there and it’s another good urban playground. This lively college town is “one of the few places where you can bike, paddle, or ski to work.” It’s one of the most bike-friendly cities in the U.S. Tucson, Arizona also got a lot of votes and this city of a half million is still reasonably priced. “Because the Old Pueblo is eminently affordable, it’s long been home to a strong community of artists, writers, chefs, and environmentalists. On the other end of the weather scale, if you don’t mind the cold there’s Traverse City, Michigan and Portland, Maine—near the LL Bean headquarters.

Outside Magazine is kind of schizo about what it puts online and what it doesn’t, so for now this rundown is only in the print edition or maybe on your iPad app if you’ve bought a subscription there.

Cool and Cheap Small Town America

Not to be outdone, Budget Travel magazine has a rundown of the 10 Coolest Small Towns in America . When they say “small,” they really mean it: the #1 choice has fewer than 4,000 people. The #6 one has a population of 309! Did every single one of them vote twice?

The towns were chosen based on 437,480 votes from Budget Travel readers. Topping the list was Lewisburg, West Virginia, a cool artsy town in one armpit of a state. (I grew up on the edge of the Appalachian Mountains in Virgina, 12 miles from the border, so my childhood was filled with hearing lots of jokes about trailer parks, rednecks, and inbreeding.)

There are small town people and city people, but if you’re one of the former it’s fun to browse through this list and see if you could imagine yourself living in Astoria, Oregon or Ripon, Wisconsin. If not, they could at least be worth filing away as places to visit on a road trip. One of them—Cedar Key, Florida—is 130 miles from where I’m living in Tampa. Looks like it’ll be worth a clam chowder run one of these days.

Small Cities and Cost of Living

There’s a strong correlation between the size of a city and the prices there. It’s not a perfect correlation by any means—more on that in a minute—but around the world it’s roughly true. The largest cities in a given country are generally the most expensive. Small towns are generally a fraction of the cost for buying or renting. This also impacts local taxes, restaurant prices (rents for them aren’t as high), and parking garage costs (ditto). It’s only natural that New York costs far more than Nashville, Mumbai far more than Mysore. Small towns in the Czech Republic are still a screaming bargain. Prague? Not so much.

There are tendencies that throw this equation off, however. Places like Ashland, Oregon and Boulder, Colorado are more expensive than you would think because of geography. They’re kind of hemmed in and space is finite. Demand exceeds supply. Other places are expensive because they’re tourist towns like Telluride or Aspen in Colorado, Phuket or Hoi An in Southeast Asia. Then you get a double whammy when it’s a combination of the both: think Venice, Nantucket, Martha’s Vineyard, Nag’s Head, Key West, or Santorini.

In many ways the mid-tier cities are the sweet spots, with big city amenities at lower prices. Plenty of interesting people and fun things to do, but you don’t have to spend half your earnings for a roof over your head.

Happy hunting!